RussellSpitzer commented on code in PR #12201:
URL: https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/12201#discussion_r1947961340


##########
core/src/main/java/org/apache/iceberg/util/TableScanUtil.java:
##########
@@ -236,6 +236,9 @@ public static long adjustSplitSize(long scanSize, int 
parallelism, long splitSiz
     // use the configured split size if it produces at least one split per slot
     // otherwise, adjust the split size to target parallelism with a 
reasonable minimum
     // increasing the split size may cause expensive spills and is not done 
automatically
+    if (splitSize <= 0) {

Review Comment:
   We already have this check immediately below,
   
   ```java
   
     private static void validatePlanningArguments(long splitSize, int 
lookback, long openFileCost) {
       Preconditions.checkArgument(splitSize > 0, "Split size must be > 0: %s", 
splitSize);
       Preconditions.checkArgument(lookback > 0, "Split planning lookback must 
be > 0: %s", lookback);
       Preconditions.checkArgument(openFileCost >= 0, "File open cost must be 
>= 0: %s", openFileCost);
     }
     ```
     
     How is this being avoided?



-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@iceberg.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@iceberg.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@iceberg.apache.org

Reply via email to