gaborkaszab commented on code in PR #4: URL: https://github.com/apache/iceberg-cpp/pull/4#discussion_r1873639268
########## .clang-format: ########## @@ -0,0 +1,22 @@ +# Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one +# or more contributor license agreements. See the NOTICE file +# distributed with this work for additional information +# regarding copyright ownership. The ASF licenses this file +# to you under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the +# "License"); you may not use this file except in compliance +# with the License. You may obtain a copy of the License at +# +# http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0 +# +# Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, +# software distributed under the License is distributed on an +# "AS IS" BASIS, WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY +# KIND, either express or implied. See the License for the +# specific language governing permissions and limitations +# under the License. +--- +BasedOnStyle: Google +ColumnLimit: 90 Review Comment: I don't think we reached consensus on this front, so would prefer not to resolve this ATM. I just want to learn what difficulties people find with 100 long lines when it comes to PR reviewing before moving on. I left the same comment on on you other review too. I'm sure that Iceberg Java has a limit of 100. I haven't found any difficulties so far reviewing code on that project. Hence the curiosity from my side. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@iceberg.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@iceberg.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@iceberg.apache.org
