liurenjie1024 commented on issue #172:
URL: https://github.com/apache/iceberg-rust/issues/172#issuecomment-2481838237

   > Sounds like a good compromise, did you have any thoughts on how this might 
integrate with the existing Datafusion machinery? I'm mainly thinking for 
configuration, so users get a good out of box experience, but one could see the 
benefits of iceberg using more of DFs first party support for things like 
parquet
   
   I'm not sure I get your point about the existing Datafusion machinery, do 
you mean how to pass configuration down to `object_store` in `FileIOBuilder`?


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@iceberg.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@iceberg.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@iceberg.apache.org

Reply via email to