Xuanwo commented on issue #172: URL: https://github.com/apache/iceberg-rust/issues/172#issuecomment-2473869889
Hi, the `FileIOProvider`, `FileIOExtension`, and `FileIO` trait all look good to me. We can initiate a design to gradually implement them. I can imagine having crates like `iceberg-fileio-opendal`, `iceberg-fileio-object-store`, `iceberg-fileio-hdfs`, and `iceberg-fileio-iouring`. We should also allow users to implement file I/O on their own, as we do for `Catalog`. Using `object_store` directly didn't seem ideal to me. iceberg-rust needs to build its own storage abstraction and integrate with the ecosystem, similar to what we do for our expression framework, so iceberg can always select the best implementations. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@iceberg.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@iceberg.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@iceberg.apache.org
