amogh-jahagirdar commented on code in PR #11131:
URL: https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/11131#discussion_r1805071134


##########
core/src/main/java/org/apache/iceberg/ManifestFilterManager.java:
##########
@@ -111,6 +115,10 @@ protected void failMissingDeletePaths() {
     this.failMissingDeletePaths = true;
   }
 
+  protected void useReferencedManifests(boolean 
useReferencedManifestsForFiltering) {

Review Comment:
   So I have a few tests now, one is testing a concurrent manifest rewrite + 
row delta which verifies that the row delta filter manager state gets updated 
(not directly since this is all package private) but via verifying the output 
manifests. Another test I added is the same concurrent manifest rewrite + row 
delta, but the row delta is performed in a transaction. The row delta operation 
internal to the transaction is committed, and then the concurrent manifest 
rewrite is committed, and then the overall row delta transaction is committed. 
This flow forces the row delta transaction to retry and switch from using 
referenced manifests as a source of truth to not using it as a source of truth 
since the subset check fails due to the new manifests not containing all the 
referenced manifests. Same test for overwrite as well. 
   
   If the logic on trusting referenced manifests changes to returning true when 
they shouldn't, these tests will fail since we end up skipping rewriting the 
manifest we should end up re-writing. So I think these tests cover what we need 
to cover.



-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@iceberg.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@iceberg.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@iceberg.apache.org

Reply via email to