rahil-c commented on PR #9940:
URL: https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/9940#issuecomment-2009489863

   > capabilities field to the response of the /config endpoint, signaling what 
is being supported by the server.
   > For scan-planning it's not clear yet whether whether we'd like to only 
have scan-planning or whether there should also be scan-pre-planning, so it's 
best to introduce this capability as part of 
https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/9695 (cc 
   
   I would assume since the server is doing work on behalf of the client for 
both scan `preplan` and `plan` table that we would want to have both of these 
reflected in the `capabilities` field?
   cc @rdblue @danielcweeks @jackye1995 
   
   
   > so it's best to introduce this capability as part of 
https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/9695 (cc @rahil-c)
   
   @nastra Also was wondering what you meant by this, did you want me to pick 
up these changes and include them into the preplan/plan pr?


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@iceberg.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@iceberg.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@iceberg.apache.org

Reply via email to