pvary commented on code in PR #9346:
URL: https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/9346#discussion_r1444311967
##########
flink/v1.18/flink/src/test/java/org/apache/iceberg/flink/source/TestIcebergSourceSql.java:
##########
@@ -39,4 +62,76 @@ public void before() throws IOException {
.getConfiguration()
.set(TableConfigOptions.TABLE_DYNAMIC_TABLE_OPTIONS_ENABLED, true);
}
+
+ private Record generateRecord(Instant t1) {
+ Record record = GenericRecord.create(SCHEMA_TS);
+ record.setField("t1", t1.atZone(ZoneId.systemDefault()).toLocalDateTime());
+ record.setField("t2", t1.getEpochSecond());
Review Comment:
> > If the watermark generation is not set, then the records from the files
are returned in the same order as we added to the table. If the watermark
generation is set, then the splits are returned in the order based on the data.
>
> both test methods enable watermark generation.
Correct - I made a mistake here. Originally I suggested not setting the
watermark generation to double check, but then decided against it, because that
order is non-defined, and we should not depend on it in tests.
That is why we went forward with the 2 column tests
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@iceberg.apache.org
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@iceberg.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@iceberg.apache.org
