10.07.2015, 11:35, "John C. Turnbull" <ozem...@ozemail.com.au>:
> Even better...
>
> Have ONE Qt product which includes all the bells and whistles and all the 
> ports but TWO licenses; an in-house license for those who do not sell their 
> products and a commercial license for those who do.
>
> The in-house license could be sold for about $50 per month and includes 
> support and upgrades.

Such license would be equivalent to support subscription, because you can 
freely use and modify any (L)GPL code in-house without any obligations (until 
you start to redistribute our derivative works)


>
> The commercial license is either free or something nominal like $10 per month 
> plus 5% of sales.
>
> That way *everyone* can afford to use Qt, *everyone* has access to all the 
> features and platform, *nobody* has to worry about lawyers and The Qt Company 
> can make a fortune even if just a few of the resulting apps make it in the 
> big time with massive sales.
>
> It's a win-win-win-win situation!
>
> -jct
>
> On 10 Jul 2015, at 18:13, John C. Turnbull <ozem...@ozemail.com.au> wrote:
>
>> Here's something out of left field...
>>
>> How about you give everyone access to the full commercial version and 
>> license of Qt with all the features and the ability to sell through app 
>> stores at no cost and then make your money purely based on a proportion of 
>> sales revenue?
>>
>> Something to think about...
>>
>> On 8 Jul 2015, at 07:47, Nuno Santos <nunosan...@imaginando.net> wrote:
>>
>>> Agree…
>>>
>>> Nuno Santos
>>> Founder / CEO / CTO
>>> www.imaginando.pt
>>> +351 91 621 69 62
>>>
>>>> On 07 Jul 2015, at 21:14, m...@rpzdesign.com wrote:
>>>>
>>>> What a perfect example given below by Jason H.
>>>>
>>>> Go ahead and search for a QT competitor product that emphasizes that you
>>>> talk to your lawyer.
>>>>
>>>> http://www.qt.io/faq/
>>>>
>>>> Again, its really bad optics when the word "lawyer" keeps popping up
>>>> and whacking potential customers in the face.
>>>>
>>>> That is causing LOSS of SALES.
>>>>
>>>> Poor John Turnbull below is now spending his money on his
>>>> lawyer or a competitor instead of sending those dollars to QT.
>>>>
>>>> The horse and water analogy applies here.
>>>>
>>>> md
>>>>
>>>> On 7/7/2015 1:36 PM, Jason H wrote:
>>>>> 1. Consult your laywer.
>>>>> 2. But there is some question if LGPL apps are allowed in the App stores.
>>>>> 3. I'd get the Indie Mobile for $25/25 (I forget) before August 31 and get
>>>>> grandfathered in. This is not advice, but it's what I would do.
>>>>> *Sent:* Tuesday, July 07, 2015 at 3:11 PM
>>>>> *From:* "John C. Turnbull" <ozem...@ozemail.com.au>
>>>>> *To:* "Ben Lau" <xben...@gmail.com>
>>>>> *Cc:* "interest@qt-project.org" <interest@qt-project.org>
>>>>> *Subject:* Re: [Interest] Indie Mobil Program terminated?
>>>>> Ok, this is all very confusing for me.  I am just starting out with Qt 
>>>>> and am
>>>>> using the LGPL edition.
>>>>> What are my limitations with that? It costs me nothing but do I have to
>>>>> distribute my source code along with the app and am I missing out on 
>>>>> features
>>>>> and/or the ability to sell my app on iOS or Android?
>>>>> I simply can't start paying $350 per month when so much is the learning 
>>>>> curve at
>>>>> the moment so is it possible to stay on this license until I actually 
>>>>> want to
>>>>> sell my app and only miss out on paid support until then? Or is it that 
>>>>> there's
>>>>> a whole bunch of features that I can't even use till I fork out that
>>>>> unsustainable amount each month?
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>> -jct
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Interest mailing list
>>>> Interest@qt-project.org
>>>> http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/interest
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Interest mailing list
>>> Interest@qt-project.org
>>> http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/interest
>> _______________________________________________
>> Interest mailing list
>> Interest@qt-project.org
>> http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/interest
> ,
>
> _______________________________________________
> Interest mailing list
> Interest@qt-project.org
> http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/interest


-- 
Regards,
Konstantin
_______________________________________________
Interest mailing list
Interest@qt-project.org
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/interest

Reply via email to