Dear Lars & Turunen: Qt has been reading their email, but still appear tone deaf:
> http://blog.qt.io/blog/2015/07/06/indie-mobile-available-until-aug-31st/ There are statements in that blog which strain QT credibility. Transparency is only ONE of several significant problems. Your feedback loops are apparently broken. Community Crisis Response and Pricing Policy VIA BLOG is a communications disaster. You have manufactured haters which will not evangelize QT, further weakening QT now and in the future. Failing to have Qt staff directly and completely address many valid questions/issues raised in the interest list and blog replies has consequences, whether obvious or not. Stop saying Open Source successfully replaces Indie, until you can provide an articulate and concise page why instead of sending all potential Indies to their lawyers to figure it out. They will not. The web site is a confusing MESS. You are LOSING sales because nobody can clearly see price VS benefits. Like Nunos Santos says: QT Rocks. Just not enough people have the time (and now the money) to bet on QT to figure it out. They need to see other users succeeding, not users bitching. This has been a terrible week for QT. Mark _______________________________________________ Interest mailing list Interest@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/interest
