Hi,
(premise: i use Qt from 1997, was Qt Ambassador, then i'm also linked
affectively to Qt). I think that the true problem is that the Qt is not
fully ready for mobile (no google maps - for google reason -, no ibeacon
support, no adversing, no pushing notify, Location, and othe minor
things). In this situation i can use Qt on mobile because i know it, but i
can't recomend Qt with professional license to start-up or individual.
If Digia wants work only with the big company it's ok. The ROI is a number
is not feeling, but a happy developer does marketing, if i'm happy i can
say try it because in the future it will ok (1 month of free professional
is good only for old Qt user).
Regards
Nicola
> On Saturday 04 July 2015 11:14:36 Bob Hood wrote:
>> IMO, that seems like a sure formula for failure to me. If you want
>> success, you have to look beyond today. It may cost you initially, as
>> long as you can forecast an ROI that exceeds today's investment.
>
> Anyone who's done a class of business school or management knows to
> calculate
> based on ROI and future cash flow. So yeah, I meant "cost more in the long
> run
> considering the return on increased sales".
>
> Note also that there's now a year of the program being run and probably
> costing more than it brought in revenue, visibility and upsale.
>
> Neither you nor I have access to those numbers. But the Qt Company does
> and
> they decided to can the programme.
> --
> Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com
> Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center
>
> _______________________________________________
> Interest mailing list
> Interest@qt-project.org
> http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/interest
>
_______________________________________________
Interest mailing list
Interest@qt-project.org
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/interest
