Hello, The indy license has been re-introduced until August 31st:
http://blog.qt.io/blog/2015/07/06/indie-mobile-available-until-aug-31st/ But it's still not good IMHO. Let me paste my pending-moderation comment here: -8<--- I can’t believe this. The new licensing has been managed in the poorest way I have ever seen. First, Indy and Professional (i. e. affordable for indies and small shops) licenses are gone. Now, Indy is re-introduced, but with a sell-by date (August 31st). And no reasonable alternative after that. Does Digia realize the *only* sales you’ll get are from developers who were already quite advanced in development and cannot afford to re-develop their apps with a new toolkit? In light of the lack of alternative for the future, I would not buy a license for developing a new app. I would rather look elsewhere. What if I need more licenses in the future? What if I need to use the Qt Purchasing APIs or the QML Compiler? No choice but the USD 350/month license. Also, what about the Professional license? Why is that one not re-introduced? -8<--- On Mon, Jul 6, 2015 at 6:46 PM, m...@rpzdesign.com <m...@rpzdesign.com> wrote: > Dear Qt Interest List: > > The optics of this reply are really not good. > > Mission Control, we have a problem..... > > md > > On 7/6/2015 10:16 AM, Thiago Macieira wrote: > > On Monday 06 July 2015 07:39:26 m...@rpzdesign.com wrote: > >> Dear Lars & Turunen: > > > > Both Lars and Tuukka are on vacation this month. > > > > _______________________________________________ > Interest mailing list > Interest@qt-project.org > http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/interest > -- Pau Garcia i Quiles http://www.elpauer.org (Due to my workload, I may need 10 days to answer)
_______________________________________________ Interest mailing list Interest@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/interest
