Op 10-10-2013 19:04, Konstantin Tokarev schreef: > > 09.10.2013, 10:21, "André Somers" <an...@familiesomers.nl>: >> Op 9-10-2013 7:34, Cornelius Schumacher schreef: >> >>> On Tuesday 08 October 2013 06:48:38 BRM wrote: >>>> Cool - I don't have any at this time, but it's good information to have >>>> and >>>> I'm sure others here do; and yes, listing the license is perhaps the one >>>> change that would be good to do - even for the Open Source libraries. >>> The license is already listed, but we should add some way of filtering >>> for the >>> license. >> Not only for the license, but on many other things. I, for one, do not >> like to go through a huge list of libraries one at a time. Rather, I'd >> like to use some keywords to search for libraries that seem to offer the >> component I'm after. >> >> Also useful: user ratings, maturity, what versions of Qt it works with, >> last update, screenshots (in case of widgets or Quick components), etc. > Are you looking for something like http://qt-apps.org ? > No, I know that site. And I find it mostly useless. There is one relevant section (components), and otherwise no further ordering. Furthermore, it is open-source only. Where I work, I can defend shelling out some cash for a component that saves us hours upon hours of work to build and maintain something similar ourselves, so I'm not opposed to using these. However, the site itself does have some good things about it.
André -- You like Qt? I am looking for collegues to join me at i-Optics! _______________________________________________ Interest mailing list Interest@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/interest
