09.10.2013, 10:21, "André Somers" <an...@familiesomers.nl>: > Op 9-10-2013 7:34, Cornelius Schumacher schreef: > >> On Tuesday 08 October 2013 06:48:38 BRM wrote: >>> Cool - I don't have any at this time, but it's good information to have and >>> I'm sure others here do; and yes, listing the license is perhaps the one >>> change that would be good to do - even for the Open Source libraries. >> The license is already listed, but we should add some way of filtering for >> the >> license. > > Not only for the license, but on many other things. I, for one, do not > like to go through a huge list of libraries one at a time. Rather, I'd > like to use some keywords to search for libraries that seem to offer the > component I'm after. > > Also useful: user ratings, maturity, what versions of Qt it works with, > last update, screenshots (in case of widgets or Quick components), etc.
Are you looking for something like http://qt-apps.org ? -- Regards, Konstantin _______________________________________________ Interest mailing list Interest@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/interest
