On Wed, Oct 9, 2013 at 11:51 AM, André Somers <an...@familiesomers.nl>wrote:
> Op 9-10-2013 7:34, Cornelius Schumacher schreef: > > On Tuesday 08 October 2013 06:48:38 BRM wrote: > >> Cool - I don't have any at this time, but it's good information to have > and > >> I'm sure others here do; and yes, listing the license is perhaps the one > >> change that would be good to do - even for the Open Source libraries. > > The license is already listed, but we should add some way of filtering > for the > > license. > > > Not only for the license, but on many other things. I, for one, do not > like to go through a huge list of libraries one at a time. Rather, I'd > like to use some keywords to search for libraries that seem to offer the > component I'm after. > +1 to that. We could have a 'tags' field in the manifest JSON which can be made searchable or used in filters. -mandeep
_______________________________________________ Interest mailing list Interest@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/interest
