On Mon, Oct 07, 2013 at 11:43:37AM +0200, Cornelius Schumacher wrote: > We all know that Qt is great, but we also know that it can't possibly cover > all use cases. Fortunately there are plenty of third party libraries based on > Qt, which fill a lot of gaps, so you don't have to develop everything > yourself. > > Finding these 3rd party Qt libraries can be a challenge, though. To address > this we started a project to create a curated archive of all relevant > Qt-based > libraries some time ago (you may want to think of that as CPAN for Qt). > > We have reached a state now, where the necessary infrastructure is there, and > it's starting to become useful for production use. You can find the web site > at > > http://inqlude.org > > To make this information more complete, I would like to give this a focused > push now. My goal is to get all relevant Qt-based libraries listed by end of > the week.
I am not quite sure how having yet-another-site could benefit the project _at all_. Why can't this be done under qt-project.org? Andre' _______________________________________________ Interest mailing list Interest@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/interest
