On 05 Aug 2001 13:21:16 -0700, David Wright wrote:
> Can we PLEASE produce a version of cyrus-imap imap WITHOUT SASL? PAM
may
> be a smidgeon less flexible, but it is simplier, more widely used and
> supports many more authentication methods. Eliminating SASL might make
> life harder for the (guestimated) 10% of cyrus-imap sites that really
> use it, but it would make life immeasurably easier for the remaining 90%
> who spend countless hours just trying to circumvent it!
>
That would not be a good idea unless you want to also fix sendmail in a
similar manner. And there'd have to be provisions for the multiple
password methods that SASL supports which is going to make LDAP a mess.
--
=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+
Jim Levie email:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Dynetics Inc, Huntsville, Al Ph. 256.964.4337
The opinions expressed above are just that...
