Lawrence Greenfield wrote:
> 
>    Date: Sun, 05 Aug 2001 21:20:55 -0700
>    From: David Wright <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> 
> [...]
>    Now when _do_authentication is run against a correct password, it
>    returns success and pam_ldap returns success, but imapd dies. If I
>    comment out the call to _do_authentication and just return success,
>    imapd does not die. So it would seem the problem lies with
>    _do_authentication.
> 
>    But here is the wierd part -- as far as I can tell, _do_authentication
>    does not interact with imapd or the SASL library at all; it contains
>    only LDAP library calls to interact with the LDAP server! And remember,
>    this interaction doesn't generate any errors, but rather runs flawlessly
>      and returns success. It seems, though, that a side-effect of this
>    interaction is to screw up the imapd so badly that it dies with a
>    "signaled to death by 11".
> 
> OpenLDAP's API contains calls to the SASL library to do it's own SASL
> negotiation with the LDAP server, thus the problem.
> 
> These sort of hard-to-track-down interactions is why version 2 of the
> SASL library will force use of a seperate process (a la pwcheck) for
> PAM, LDAP, or other sorts of authentication.

Could this be a simple problem of OpenLDAP and Cyrus-imapd being linked
against different version SASL libraries, or worse yet different
databases libraries?

Ken
-- 
Kenneth Murchison     Oceana Matrix Ltd.
Software Engineer     21 Princeton Place
716-662-8973 x26      Orchard Park, NY 14127
--PGP Public Key--    http://www.oceana.com/~ken/ksm.pgp

Reply via email to