Re: signaled to death by 11 -- solved!?

[David Wright]

> What's wrong with having both PAM and SASL in the implementation?  And
> isn't this the case?  I'm still using Cyrus IMAP 2.0.13 so maybe PAM
> has been removed since, but I would be surprised.

PAM has never been in the distribution. SASL is in the distribution and 
PAM is supported by SASL. That sounds fine in theory, but in practice it 
appears that SASL's PAM support has some problems.