We deal with this on a regular basis in TF2. We use this plugin to block
all major VPN providers.

http://forums.alliedmods.net/showthread.php?p=2025265


On Sat, Oct 19, 2013 at 4:23 PM, Kyle Sanderson <[email protected]> wrote:

> Today, we're seeing a ton of banned, griefing players using VPNs and
> throw-away Steam accounts to bypass server bans. The problem already seems
> to be pretty widespread in CS:S. Considering this is the first weekend
> where the beta was opened up, it's only going to get worse. I'm sure this
> isn't isolated to CS:S, or my servers. There are many others running
> community servers, some probably not even using Source that are impacted by
> this. The native Steam Exploit seems to be getting abused quite heavily.
>
> The theoretical is now the present,
> Kyle.
>
>
> On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 7:09 AM, Jesse Oak <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > Every game copy should have an ID associated with it, this way an admin
> > can ban per copy of the game rather then player ID. It's bad enough right
> > now in TF2 and some of the Source mod games where a griefer can just
> > quickly make a new account and reset their IP address having this start
> to
> > happen in games like CSGO is going to be a major pain for admins.
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 1:29 AM, Valentin G. <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> >
> >> Banning by IP is useless for many countries. And if cheaters abuse the
> >> family sharing they will certainly go to the "lengths" of making a quick
> >> new dial-in to grab that new IP.
> >>
> >> I have already said this much on the Beta Forums, and fully agree with
> >> Kyle. This brings the TF2 F2P dilemma to every title.
> >>
> >>
> >> On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 6:58 AM, Dominik Friedrichs <[email protected]
> >wrote:
> >>
> >>> On 2013/10/18 03:38, N-Gon wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> I agree with Dog.
> >>>> However, I would also like to note that with SourceMod you could ban
> the
> >>>> users by IP. Sure they can change it, but most of the trolls are
> either
> >>>> too stupid to figure out how or too stupid to figure out how to do it
> >>>> quickly. Meaning you'd see the "repeat offender" now and then, but not
> >>>> enough to be too much of a nuisance.
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>> I'd like to note that for broadband providers in my area it is quite
> >>> common to hand out a different IP on every dial in, while a connection
> with
> >>> that same IP can be kept alive for 24 hours at maximum. Hence I would
> never
> >>> bother to ban by IP if the ban is supposed to be longer than a few
> hours.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> ______________________________**_________________
> >>> To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives,
> >>> please visit:
> >>> https://list.valvesoftware.**com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/**hlds<
> https://list.valvesoftware.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/hlds>
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives,
> >> please visit:
> >> https://list.valvesoftware.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/hlds
> >>
> >>
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives,
> > please visit:
> > https://list.valvesoftware.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/hlds
> >
> >
> _______________________________________________
> To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives,
> please visit:
> https://list.valvesoftware.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
>
_______________________________________________
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please 
visit:
https://list.valvesoftware.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux

Reply via email to