github  

Messages by Thread

• • Re: [PR] refactor: Update SortMergeJoin to use async spill abstractions [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] refactor: Update SortMergeJoin to use async spill abstractions [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] refactor: Update SortMergeJoin to use async spill abstractions [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] refactor: Update SortMergeJoin to use async spill abstractions [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] refactor: Update SortMergeJoin to use async spill abstractions [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] refactor: Update SortMergeJoin to use async spill abstractions [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] feat: implement retract_batch for array_agg(DISTINCT) sliding window [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: implement retract_batch for array_agg(DISTINCT) sliding window [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: implement retract_batch for array_agg(DISTINCT) sliding window [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: implement retract_batch for array_agg(DISTINCT) sliding window [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] fix generate_series table function overflows [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix generate_series table function overflows [datafusion] via GitHub
• [PR] chore(docker): Use yellow_tripdata_2022-01.parquet from nightlies.apache.org [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] chore(docker): Use yellow_tripdata_2022-01.parquet from nightlies.apache.org [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] chore(docker): Use yellow_tripdata_2022-01.parquet from nightlies.apache.org [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] chore(docker): Use yellow_tripdata_2022-01.parquet from nightlies.apache.org [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
• [PR] Chore skip agg [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: make skip_partial_aggregation_probe_ratio_threshold match the docs [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: make skip_partial_aggregation_probe_ratio_threshold match the docs [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: make skip_partial_aggregation_probe_ratio_threshold match the docs [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: make skip_partial_aggregation_probe_ratio_threshold match the docs [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: make skip_partial_aggregation_probe_ratio_threshold match the docs [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] Fix volatile scalar subquery deduplication [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix volatile scalar subquery deduplication [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix volatile scalar subquery deduplication [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix volatile scalar subquery deduplication [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix volatile scalar subquery deduplication [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] chore(deps): bump astral-sh/setup-uv from 8.1.0 to 8.2.0 [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] chore(deps): bump aws-config from 1.8.17 to 1.8.18 [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] chore(deps): bump aws-config from 1.8.17 to 1.8.18 [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] chore(deps): bump actions/checkout from 6.0.2 to 6.0.3 [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] chore(deps): bump taiki-e/install-action from 2.79.8 to 2.81.3 [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] chore(deps): bump github/codeql-action from 4.36.0 to 4.36.1 [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] chore(deps): bump taiki-e/install-action from 2.79.9 to 2.81.3 [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] feat: implement Spark-compatible weekday function [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: implement Spark-compatible weekday function [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] chore(deps): bump log from 0.4.30 to 0.4.31 [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] chore(deps): bump actions/checkout from 6.0.2 to 6.0.3 [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] chore(deps): bump github/codeql-action from 4.36.0 to 4.36.1 [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] chore(deps): bump pbjson-types from 0.8.0 to 0.9.0 in the proto group [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] chore(deps): bump pbjson-types from 0.8.0 to 0.9.0 in the proto group [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] Add declared file scan output partitioning [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add declared file scan output partitioning [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add declared file scan output partitioning [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add declared file scan output partitioning [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add declared file scan output partitioning [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add declared file scan output partitioning [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add declared file scan output partitioning [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add declared file scan output partitioning [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add declared file scan output partitioning [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add declared file scan output partitioning [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add declared file scan output partitioning [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add declared file scan output partitioning [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add declared file scan output partitioning [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add declared file scan output partitioning [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add declared file scan output partitioning [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add declared file scan output partitioning [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add declared file scan output partitioning [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add declared file scan output partitioning [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add declared file scan output partitioning [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add declared file scan output partitioning [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add declared file scan output partitioning [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add declared file scan output partitioning [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add declared file scan output partitioning [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add declared file scan output partitioning [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add declared file scan output partitioning [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add declared file scan output partitioning [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add declared file scan output partitioning [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add declared file scan output partitioning [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] feat(physical-plan): add GroupColumn support for FixedSizeList / List / LargeList / Struct in multi-column GROUP BY [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat(physical-plan): add GroupColumn support for FixedSizeList / List / LargeList / Struct in multi-column GROUP BY [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat(physical-plan): add GroupColumn support for FixedSizeList / List / LargeList / Struct in multi-column GROUP BY [datafusion] via GitHub
• [PR] refactor(physical-plan): extract make_group_column factory + tighten Time variants + dhat harness [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] refactor(physical-plan): extract make_group_column factory + tighten Time variants + dhat harness [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] refactor(physical-plan): extract make_group_column factory + tighten Time variants + dhat harness [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] refactor(physical-plan): extract make_group_column factory + tighten Time variants + dhat harness [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] refactor(physical-plan): extract make_group_column factory + tighten Time variants + dhat harness [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] refactor(physical-plan): extract make_group_column factory + tighten Time variants + dhat harness [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] refactor(physical-plan): extract make_group_column factory + tighten Time variants + dhat harness [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] refactor(physical-plan): extract make_group_column factory + tighten Time variants + dhat harness [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] refactor(physical-plan): extract make_group_column factory + tighten Time variants + dhat harness [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] refactor(physical-plan): extract make_group_column factory + tighten Time variants + dhat harness [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] refactor(physical-plan): extract make_group_column factory + tighten Time variants + dhat harness [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] refactor(physical-plan): extract make_group_column factory + eager init at try_new + tighten Time variants [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] refactor(physical-plan): extract make_group_column factory + eager init at try_new + tighten Time variants [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] refactor(physical-plan): extract make_group_column factory + eager init at try_new + tighten Time variants [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] refactor(physical-plan): extract make_group_column factory + eager init at try_new + tighten Time variants [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] refactor(physical-plan): extract make_group_column factory + eager init at try_new + tighten Time variants [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] refactor(physical-plan): extract make_group_column factory + eager init at try_new + tighten Time variants [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] refactor(physical-plan): extract make_group_column factory + eager init at try_new + tighten Time variants [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] refactor(physical-plan): extract make_group_column factory + eager init at try_new + tighten Time variants [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] refactor(physical-plan): extract make_group_column factory + eager init at try_new + tighten Time variants [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] refactor(physical-plan): extract make_group_column factory + eager init at try_new + tighten Time variants [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] refactor(physical-plan): extract make_group_column factory + eager init at try_new + tighten Time variants [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] refactor(physical-plan): extract make_group_column factory + eager init at try_new + tighten Time variants [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] refactor(physical-plan): extract make_group_column factory + eager init at try_new + tighten Time variants [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [I] [EPIC] Implement Range Partitioning [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] [EPIC] Implement Range Partitioning [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] perf(logical-plan): box CreateExternalTable / CreateFunction in DdlStatement (-45% LogicalPlan size) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf(logical-plan): box CreateExternalTable / CreateFunction in DdlStatement (-45% LogicalPlan size) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf(logical-plan): box CreateExternalTable / CreateFunction in DdlStatement (-45% LogicalPlan size) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf(logical-plan): box CreateExternalTable / CreateFunction in DdlStatement (-45% LogicalPlan size) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf(logical-plan): box CreateExternalTable / CreateFunction in DdlStatement (-45% LogicalPlan size) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf(logical-plan): box CreateExternalTable / CreateFunction in DdlStatement (-45% LogicalPlan size) [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] Reject negative ln inputs [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Reject negative ln inputs [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [I] Support StringSplitSQL to enable split_part [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] perf: Reorder predicates in conjuncts via simple heuristic [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: Reorder predicates in conjuncts via simple heuristic [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: Reorder predicates in conjuncts via simple heuristic [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: Reorder predicates in conjuncts via simple heuristic [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: Reorder predicates in conjuncts via simple heuristic [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] refactor: Split hash aggregation logic into separated streams [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] refactor: Split hash aggregation logic into separated streams [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] refactor: Split hash aggregation logic into separated streams [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] refactor: Split hash aggregation logic into separated streams [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] refactor: Split hash aggregation logic into separated streams [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] refactor: Split hash aggregation logic into separated streams [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] refactor: Split hash aggregation logic into separated streams [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] refactor: Split hash aggregation logic into separated streams [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] refactor: Split hash aggregation logic into separated streams [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] refactor: Split hash aggregation logic into separated streams [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] refactor: Split hash aggregation logic into separated streams [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] refactor: Split hash aggregation logic into separated streams [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] refactor: Split hash aggregation logic into separated streams [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] refactor: Split hash aggregation logic into separated streams [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] refactor: Split hash aggregation logic into separated streams [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] refactor: Split hash aggregation logic into separated streams [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] refactor: Split hash aggregation logic into separated streams [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] refactor: Split hash aggregation logic into separated streams [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] refactor: Split hash aggregation logic into separated streams [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] refactor: Split hash aggregation logic into separated streams [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] refactor: Split hash aggregation logic into separated streams [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] refactor: Split hash aggregation logic into separated streams [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] refactor: Split hash aggregation logic into separated streams [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] refactor: Split hash aggregation logic into separated streams [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] refactor: Split hash aggregation logic into separated streams [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] refactor: Split hash aggregation logic into separated streams [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] refactor: Split hash aggregation logic into separated streams [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] refactor: Split hash aggregation logic into separated streams [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] refactor: Split hash aggregation logic into separated streams [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] refactor: Split hash aggregation logic into separated streams [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] refactor: Split hash aggregation logic into separated streams [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] refactor: Split hash aggregation logic into separated streams [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] refactor: Split hash aggregation logic into separated streams [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] refactor: Split hash aggregation logic into separated streams [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] refactor: Split hash aggregation logic into separated streams [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] refactor: Split hash aggregation logic into separated streams [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] perf: early termination for right semi/anti hash joins [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [I] NestedLoopJoinExec spill path: untracked allocation overshoots memory pool [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] NestedLoopJoinExec spill path: untracked allocation overshoots memory pool [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] NestedLoopJoinExec spill path: untracked allocation overshoots memory pool [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] NestedLoopJoinExec spill path: untracked allocation overshoots memory pool [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] NestedLoopJoinExec spill path: untracked allocation overshoots memory pool [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] NestedLoopJoinExec spill path: untracked allocation overshoots memory pool [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] NestedLoopJoinExec spill path: untracked allocation overshoots memory pool [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] NestedLoopJoinExec spill path: untracked allocation overshoots memory pool [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] NestedLoopJoinExec spill path: untracked allocation overshoots memory pool [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] NestedLoopJoinExec spill path: untracked allocation overshoots memory pool [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] NestedLoopJoinExec spill path: untracked allocation overshoots memory pool [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] NestedLoopJoinExec spill path: untracked allocation overshoots memory pool [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] NestedLoopJoinExec spill path: untracked allocation overshoots memory pool [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] NestedLoopJoinExec spill path: untracked allocation overshoots memory pool [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] NestedLoopJoinExec spill path: untracked allocation overshoots memory pool [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] feat: add support `parse_url` [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] fix: [WIP] negative zero sort [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] fix: Percent Encoding of paths for hive style partitioning [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: Percent Encoding of paths for hive style partitioning [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] feat: replace `ScalarValue` with `DynComparator` for RANGE calculation [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: replace `ScalarValue` with `DynComparator` for RANGE calculation [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] Defer task spawning in SortPreservingMergeExec to first poll [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Defer task spawning in SortPreservingMergeExec to first poll [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] perf: Improve planning time w/ global default `ConfigOptions` [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: Improve planning time w/ global default `ConfigOptions` [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] Update contributor names in changelog for version 52.4.0 [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Update contributor names in changelog for version 52.4.0 [datafusion] via GitHub
• [PR] feat: rebalance associative bitwise/Add/Multiply chains to avoid protobuf recursion limit [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] feat: Stage based fallback [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: Stage based fallback [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: Stage based fallback [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: Stage based fallback [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
• [PR] chore(deps): bump the all-other-cargo-deps group with 6 updates [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] chore(deps): bump the all-other-cargo-deps group with 6 updates [datafusion] via GitHub
  • [PR] chore(deps): bump the all-other-cargo-deps group with 6 updates [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] chore(deps): bump the all-other-cargo-deps group across 1 directory with 6 updates [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [I] Release DataFusion `54.0.0` (Apr 2026 / May 2026) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Release DataFusion `54.0.0` (Apr 2026 / May 2026) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Release DataFusion `54.0.0` (Apr 2026 / May 2026) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Release DataFusion `54.0.0` (Apr 2026 / May 2026) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Release DataFusion `54.0.0` (Apr 2026 / May 2026) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Release DataFusion `54.0.0` (Apr 2026 / May 2026) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Release DataFusion `54.0.0` (Apr 2026 / May 2026) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Release DataFusion `54.0.0` (Apr 2026 / May 2026) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Release DataFusion `54.0.0` (Apr 2026 / May 2026) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Release DataFusion `54.0.0` (Apr 2026 / May 2026) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Release DataFusion `54.0.0` (Apr 2026 / May 2026) [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] feat: support binary and string types for concat UDFs [datafusion] via GitHub
• [PR] feat: implement native existence join implementation [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: implement native existence join implementation [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: implement native native existence join support [datafusion-comet] via GitHub

• Later messages