LucaCappelletti94 commented on issue #2591: URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-sqlparser-rs/issues/2591#issuecomment-5853649788
@mohitgurav20 Just like #2587, this is an issue to get agreement from the other maintainers. If agreed, it will require stacked PRs, which need write access. The comment above restates this issue back to it, like most of the analyses you posted with `take` on nine apache/datafusion issues in three days. Using LLMs as coding support is fine, they are great tools. What is not okay is using them blindly or posting their output directly to people and maintainers. The [DataFusion AI policy discourages that behaviour](https://datafusion.apache.org/contributor-guide/index.html#ai-assisted-contributions). Please read https://gruhn.me/blog/2026-08-03/ and do not post generated comments here. If you want to help, we are trying to chip away at existing bugs using the fuzzing harnesses I added. Feel free to start running the fuzzer locally on your machine for any of them. Nowadays generating code is extremely cheap and we could all do it. The hard part is making sure it is correct, and we are at capacity with our ability to do reviews. @alamb as I mentioned in https://github.com/apache/datafusion-sqlparser-rs/issues/2588, I believe we should update the AI policy in our [AGENTS.md](https://github.com/apache/datafusion-sqlparser-rs/blob/main/AGENTS.md) to discourage this type of behaviour, as the rust-lang core repositories have started doing in their [PR templates](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-clippy/blob/master/.github/PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE.md) following https://forge.rust-lang.org/policies/llm-usage.html <details><summary>Archived copies of the nine claims and the three PRs</summary> Wayback Machine snapshots taken on 2026-09-27. - apache/datafusion#25622 https://web.archive.org/web/20260927064142/https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/25622 - apache/datafusion#25708 https://web.archive.org/web/20260927064357/https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/25708 - apache/datafusion#25712 https://web.archive.org/web/20260927064425/https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/25712 - apache/datafusion#25720 https://web.archive.org/web/20260927064453/https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/25720 - apache/datafusion#25734 https://web.archive.org/web/20260927064522/https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/25734 - apache/datafusion#25736 https://web.archive.org/web/20260927064736/https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/25736 - apache/datafusion#25716 https://web.archive.org/web/20260927064948/https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/25716 - apache/datafusion#25719 https://web.archive.org/web/20260927065021/https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/25719 - apache/datafusion#25750 https://web.archive.org/web/20260927065049/https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/25750 The Wayback Machine did not capture these three, so they link the comments directly. - apache/datafusion#25623 https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/25623#issuecomment-5821886614 - apache/datafusion#25735 https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/25735#issuecomment-5829161046 - apache/datafusion#25775 https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/25775#issuecomment-5845823871 </details> -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
