On 15/07/15 21:27, stefano.costa wrote:
> Perhaps next time I should submit a PR to ease your work, even if I'm not 
> fully confident about the fix?

Yes, please. Pull requests ease workflow and facilitate discussion. Any 
doubts as to correctness can be mentioned in the comments.

>> The code base is very complicated.
> I'm glad to hear you say that, now I know I'm not the only one feeling that 
> way :-)
> If I ever discover the root cause of the issue, I'll report back to the ML.

Please do!

> Thanks again for confirming that the patch works and for merging it!

You are welcome. I am pleased to see more use of app-schema.

By the way do you know if INSPIRE GeologyCore is meant to replace 
GeoSciML? I do not know anything about it; GeologyCore seems to have 
some commonality, but be more oriented towards environmental sciences 
(no surprise here as that is the mandate for INSPIRE), whereas GeoSciML 
seems focussed on hard rock geology. Any opinions?

Kind regards,

-- 
Ben Caradoc-Davies <[email protected]>
Director
Transient Software Limited <http://transient.nz/>
New Zealand

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Don't Limit Your Business. Reach for the Cloud.
GigeNET's Cloud Solutions provide you with the tools and support that
you need to offload your IT needs and focus on growing your business.
Configured For All Businesses. Start Your Cloud Today.
https://www.gigenetcloud.com/
_______________________________________________
Geoserver-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-users

Reply via email to