-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Donnie Berkholz wrote: > Mike Doty wrote: >> apparent decline of QA in our packages. > > Anyone got numbers for that? Talking opinions, as in the SCM discussion, > isn't real meaningful. > > Thanks, > Donnie What metric would you use? the number of stages tried against a live tree before one can install? the number of companies leaving gentoo for another distro? bugs? mailing list posts? number of users?
I don't know of a good metric for what you ask. Here's what I do know: 1) a QA team was formed in 06 2) QA has not visibly improved since then. To the outsider, it looks like it's gotten worse. - -- ======================================================= Mike Doty kingtaco -at- gentoo.org Gentoo Council Gentoo Infrastructure Gentoo/AMD64 Strategic Lead GPG: E1A5 1C9C 93FE F430 C1D6 F2AF 806B A2E4 19F4 AE05 ======================================================= -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.2 (GNU/Linux) iQCVAwUBRhUk0oBrouQZ9K4FAQLY0QP/fa1wU/4yJsc7eY5m/GVCrsJPNYreQf70 JxnWDBfu1bCn6byGjYnRb5rHc0MIJ6BfwxEm1cD6KKF89fRIG4RxZyzGDZd3ISnv m5tkhjHnl4EQHJyGHI/Jh5SQomFNDZJBtoRLP0YHuejCfrd6YjXoLd/PGMKogBg1 LSlthDzxrmw= =qj95 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
