On Thursday 05 April 2007, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > Unfortunately, what the GLEP doesn't do is prevent the Council from > having secret meetings and refusing to discuss not only the content of > those meetings but even the topic. Perhaps a requirement that any > Council meeting logs be made public would be useful, with a waiver > that the Council can have a secret meeting if it officially announces > that it is doing so?
what exactly does this solve ? nothing ? we go from having meetings nobody knows about where discussions happen that no one sees to having meetings everyone knows about where discussions happen that no one sees ... the only thing that comes from this is now people have more things to refer to vaguely to support lame "hypothetical" sitautions ive got a better idea Ciaran, stop spreading FUD ... i do believe we have something now that says purposefully spreading FUD is a no no -mike
pgpTlO1F2WVYB.pgp
Description: PGP signature
