> > This appears to leave us with sci-ai/* because: > > First, 'AI' seems to be the term that is commonly used (just look at > this mail's subject) and understood. > > Secondly, while others may find sci-ai to buzzwordy, that could also > been seen as an advantage.
This. Buzzwordy is kinda fine since categories are a human-oriented interface. I.e., what is the first you think about where you would expect a package... ++ for sci-ai (Now, is it really sci-ai, or should we also come up with dev-ai (for libraries without explicit scientific context) and sys-ai (for accelerator device drivers) in addition? :) > > And finally, maybe there will be non-deep-learning packages which we > then could put under sci-ai/*. > > - Flow > -- Andreas K. Hüttel dilfri...@gentoo.org Gentoo Linux developer (council, comrel, toolchain, base-system, perl, libreoffice) https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/User:Dilfridge
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
