Hi - Let’s discuss outside the immediate context of MxNet reasons for the IPMC to suspend a podling.
Regards, Dave Sent from my iPhone > On Oct 21, 2020, at 8:57 PM, Justin Mclean <jus...@classsoftware.com> wrote: > > HI, > >> Don’t make a noncompliant binary release. > > The project is (sadly) already doing this [1], they are hoping the licensing > issue can be sorted, but its taken more than 5 months and little visible > progress on that seems to have been done. NVIDIA is considering changing, > but to what we don’t know. > >> Tell your users how to make a noncompliant build on their own knowing the >> risks. > > They don’t want to do that, as it is too hard for users to compile. > >> Third parties like NVIDIA can make their own decision and release, but can’t >> call it Apache MxNext, but have to use “powered by” if they use the brand. > > This has been brought many times by the IPMC over many months, but it seems > they still seem to have branding and naming issues. [2] > > Thanks, > Justin > > 1. https://pypi.org/project/mxnet/ > 2. https://ngc.nvidia.com/catalog/containers/nvidia:mxnet --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
