Hi, > Thanks for the vote. It looks like we forgot to remove the mentions of the > resolved issues in the DISCLAIMER-WIP. Checking the linked issues, all of > them have been resolved in 1.8. Is this still a blocking issue if the actual > issues that the DISCLAIMER-WIP links to are addressed?
The DISCLAIMER WIP needs to be keep up to date. When I looked not all of these issues were resolved. > Between 1.8 submodules [1] and that of 1.7 [2] there hasn't been any addition > of submodule. For the four modules with updated commits (dmlc-core, mkldnn, > nvidia-cub, onnx-tensorrt), I didn't find any license change. What's missing? If you compare the copyright statements between the two release you’ll see there are a number of differences and mention of bundled 3rd party licenses are missing from the LICENSE file. > Regarding NVIDIA licensing, I'm not sure what the standard practice is given > that we are indeed open sourcing our GPU source code with ALv2 and the NVIDIA > licensing only comes into picture in binary distribution and not in a source > release. Advice is appreciated. You need to tell your users that using the software in this way that it is not compatible with the Apache license. I think the DISCLAIMER would be a good place to do this. Thanks, Justin --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
