Hi - This would be a legitimate thread on private@, or in a generic email on dev@ asking for and suggesting responses on private@. The principle is allowing personnel/personal decisions to remain private at the individual’s choice.
Regards, Dave Sent from my iPhone > On Mar 23, 2018, at 8:02 PM, David Neuman <david.neuma...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Will do, thanks. > >> On Fri, Mar 23, 2018 at 19:04 John D. Ament <johndam...@apache.org> wrote: >> >> On Fri, Mar 23, 2018 at 9:02 PM David Neuman <david.neuma...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >>> Great, thanks a lot for the info John. Since I have spoken to each of >> the >>> PMC members in question individually, I think we are safe to make our >>> changes and have them continue on as committers. >>> >> >> Remember, if it didn't happen on list it didn't happen. Please make sure >> you check with these individuals on list. >> >> >>> >>> On Fri, Mar 23, 2018 at 16:27 John D. Ament <johndam...@apache.org> >> wrote: >>> >>>> Its quite common that people stop working on open source projects. >>>> However, part of the Apache way is merit never expires. While you may >>> not >>>> want to include them in your PMC, keeping them available as a committer >>>> isn't a bad thing. >>>> >>>> Most podlings I've seen will send an email "here's the proposed PMC, >>> speak >>>> up if you need a change." If any of those people want to be on the >> PMC, >>>> still honor their request. However if they are not interested then its >>>> safe to assume they would have responded. >>>> >>>> I do recommend if you are going to make changes, that the changes are >>>> finalized in the roster before submitting the resolution to the board. >>>> This may involve sending the IPMC notices for new PPMC members ahead of >>>> time, just to keep it clean. Having your roster correct means everyone >>>> gets the right permissions without the chair having to do anything. >>>> >>>> John >>>> >>>> On Fri, Mar 23, 2018 at 6:14 PM Carlos Santana <csantan...@gmail.com> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> For Apache OpenWhisk we are in same situation so it would be good to >>>>> understand the guideline on how to handle such situation. >>>>> >>>>> - Carlos Santana >>>>> @csantanapr >>>>> >>>>>> On Mar 23, 2018, at 4:06 PM, Dave Neuman <neu...@apache.org> >> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> Hey IPMC, >>>>>> I had a question about altering the PMC for graduation. >>>>>> We have a few folks who are no longer active participants in our >>>> project >>>>>> that are still a part of our PMC. In the process of generating our >>>>>> graduation resolution we were wondering if we could take the >>>> opportunity >>>>> to >>>>>> have these members just be committers and not PMC members anymore? >>> If >>>>> yes, >>>>>> what would the process look like, would it be enough to just make >> the >>>>>> roster alterations in Whimsy? I have already spoken to each of >> these >>>>>> people individually and made sure they were on-board with just >> being >>>>>> committers and not PMC members. >>>>>> >>>>>> We are really excited to draft our resolution and I think this is >> the >>>>> last >>>>>> thing standing in our way! >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Thanks in advance for the help! >>>>>> >>>>>> Dave >>>>> >>>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org >>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
