On Sun, Feb 19, 2017 at 11:09 PM Roman Shaposhnik <ro...@shaposhnik.org> wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 19, 2017 at 8:01 PM, Niclas Hedhman <hedh...@gmail.com> wrote: > > I haven't followed this issue, but if we take BSD licensed source and > > modifies it (enough to claim copyright on the modifications) we > re-license > > to ALv2, but leaves the original BSD headers (if any) in the source. > > > > CatA licenses are CatA because they allow modifications on source and > > re-license... > > Correct. Which seems to make Roy's proposal a superset of what you're > talking > about. Now, while we can debate whether we can accomplish something similar > to what he was suggesting by some other means -- I'd rather vote for > simplicity > and go ahead with this: > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LEGAL-293?focusedCommentId=15873943&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#comment-15873943 > > At this point -- I just need to see if there's anybody who's strongly > opposed this > approach. > Doing what you've outlined was my original request, so I have no qualms. It had seemed to me that the preference was to not relicense. But I am glad we are relicensing. > > Thanks, > Roman. > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > >
