AFAIK, only the copyright holder can relicense a copyrighted work, whereas others may sublicense under compatible terms so long as the original license grants that permission (ie: the license of the original work is not actually changing).
Is that not correct? - Mike On Feb 20, 2017 10:35 AM, "John D. Ament" <johndam...@apache.org> wrote: Mike, I'll point out that sublicense is probably not the right term. While both are Cat A, the BSD license is much less restrictive/offers less than the Apache license. Re-license is more accurate. Its still compatible with BSD, and removes any expectation that one is more/less than the other license. On Sun, Feb 19, 2017 at 11:19 PM Mike Jumper <mike.jum...@guac-dev.org> wrote: > On Feb 19, 2017 8:01 PM, "Niclas Hedhman" <hedh...@gmail.com> wrote: > > ... > CatA licenses are CatA because they allow modifications on source and > re-license... > > > sublicense* > > - Mike >
