On Sun, Feb 19, 2017 at 8:01 PM, Niclas Hedhman <hedh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I haven't followed this issue, but if we take BSD licensed source and
> modifies it (enough to claim copyright on the modifications) we re-license
> to ALv2, but leaves the original BSD headers (if any) in the source.
>
> CatA licenses are CatA because they allow modifications on source and
> re-license...
Correct. Which seems to make Roy's proposal a superset of what you're talking
about. Now, while we can debate whether we can accomplish something similar
to what he was suggesting by some other means -- I'd rather vote for simplicity
and go ahead with this:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LEGAL-293?focusedCommentId=15873943&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#comment-15873943
At this point -- I just need to see if there's anybody who's strongly
opposed this
approach.
Thanks,
Roman.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
