No problem at all. Just to be sure we don't duplicate work ;) Regards JB
On Feb 14, 2017, 12:28, at 12:28, Henry Saputra <henry.sapu...@gmail.com> wrote: >Ah yes, sorry, totally missed your message. > >On Tue, Feb 14, 2017 at 3:02 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <j...@nanthrax.net> >wrote: > >> Hi >> >> I guess you missed my message. I gonna deal with CarbonData. >> >> Regards >> JB >> >> On Feb 13, 2017, 19:26, at 19:26, Henry Saputra ><henry.sapu...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >Thanks, John. I think CarbonData and SystemML may ready for >graduation. >> > >> >Looks like Luciano will work with SystemML, then I will work with >> >CarbonData. >> > >> >- Henry >> > >> >On Mon, Feb 13, 2017 at 4:28 AM, John D. Ament ><johndam...@apache.org> >> >wrote: >> > >> >> All, >> >> >> >> As mentioned in this month's report, there are 63 active podlings. >> >While >> >> I've been chasing retiring podlings, I think it would be good for >the >> >> community as a whole to look closely as podlings and see what we >can >> >do to >> >> graduate podlings that seem to be doing well. >> >> >> >> Take a look at the last two reports: >> >> >> >> https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/February2017 >> >> https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/January2017 >> >> >> >> Last month, I listed 4 podlings that appear to have completed all >> >> graduation requirements, but remain in the incubator (Airflow, >> >BatchEE, >> >> Freemarker, Metron). I didn't include that in February, but if I >had >> >to >> >> list the names, it would be: CarbonData, Edgent, Fineract, >Guacamole, >> >> PredictionIO, SystemML, Tamaya, Unomi (but that's entirely my >> >POV/opinion >> >> unless others want to chime in). >> >> >> >> So I'm curious, what can others do to help these 12 podlings get >past >> >the >> >> finish line? >> >> >> >> John >> >> >>
