Yes absolutely. Le mar. 18 nov. 2014 10:33, Hendrik Dev <hendrikde...@gmail.com> a écrit :
> Due to the fact that the release artifacts are not distributed yet i > suggest that we simply start a (new) incubator vote for the release > to resolve the idleness regarding the release process and separate the > general discussion (if necessary) into another thread. > > Is that feasible ? > > Thanks > Hendrik > > > > > On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 2:37 PM, Marvin Humphrey <mar...@rectangular.com> > wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 2:00 AM, Mark Struberg <strub...@yahoo.de> > wrote: > >> Previously there was a clear rule > >> 1.) do the internal vote and if that succeeds > >> 2.) do another VOTE on the general@incubator list. > > > > That's still the rule. > > > > The wider Incubator PMC must be given full opportunity to review any > release. > > > > The 2013 Alternate Release Voting Process is not being used right now, > but > > even if it was, a VOTE on general@incubator would still be required. > > > > The "send a summary" phrase in the documentation for the Alternate > process was > > deliberately copied from the original text to avoid changing any more > than > > necessary. > > > > http://incubator.apache.org/incubation/Incubation_Policy. > html#Releases > > > > Original: > > > > If the majority of all votes is positive, then the Podling SHALL > send > > a summary of that vote to the Incubator's general list and > formally > > request the Incubator PMC approve such a release. > > > > Alternate: > > > > If the majority of PPMC votes is positive, then the Podling > SHALL send > > a summary of that vote to the Incubator's general list and > formally > > request the Incubator PMC approve such a release. > > > > It is not sufficient to "send a summary". The podling needs to "formal > > request that the Incubator PMC approve" -- i.e. call a VOTE on > > general@incubator. The criteria for passing differ under the Alternate > > process, but the general@incubator VOTE has to happen regardless. > > > > Now, we tend to "forward" IPMC votes from the podling dev list, which is > > arguably confusing because it doesn't follow the letter of the law. But > I > > sure hope nobody wants to start failing release VOTEs because some IPMC > member > > voted only on the PPMC thread. > > > > Marvin Humphrey > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > > > > > > -- > Hendrik Saly (salyh, hendrikdev22) > @hendrikdev22 > PGP: 0x22D7F6EC > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > >
