Justin,
On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 5:30 AM, Justin Mclean <jus...@classsoftware.com> wrote: > Hi, > > > The IPMCs in the dev@ list should recast its +1 vote in the general > > list to be accounted for. > > Which is not in line in previous advice given on the list, for instance > see last BatchEE release.. > Are you referring to this email, about the alternate voting rule? [1] Even if the podling wanted to use the alternate voting rules, it needs to be approved via a vote on general@. For these two podlings, you'll notice that they're pretty heavy on IPMC members. I don't think the alternate voting process would be of use to either of them. With that said, my real interpretation of the alternate voting rule is that if the IPMC has approved a podling to use it, and the podling has enough community growth, it really means the podling is ready to graduate. John > > What are other IPMC views on this? Happy to do it either way, but IMO .an > extra VOTE seems unnecessary when the project already has 3 + 1 IPMC votes. > Revoting on general has been what people have done for a long time. There's no reason to change that. > > Thanks, > Justin > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > > [1]: http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-general/201411.mbox/%3CCAOqetn8HOKepYZ5K9P3DA%2B0u-EO%2BtMyPCgwwVmXfmvHgJ8NxKA%40mail.gmail.com%3E
