Previously there was a clear rule 1.) do the internal vote and if that succeeds 2.) do another VOTE on the general@incubator list.
This got pretty much blurred up and streamlined. And by that we now have a situation where not even old IPMC members like me know how to proceed properly. I understand the reason for this streamlining, but it seems there is no clear guideline right now. .) Do we need to and how long shall we wait after pinging general@i.a.o ? .) Do we need to send a ping when an incubator project starts with the VOTE? .) How to handle multiple release attempts? I suggest we get this straight to prevent further confusion. LieGrue, strub ----- Original Message ----- > From: Justin Mclean <jus...@classsoftware.com> > To: general@incubator.apache.org > Cc: > Sent: Monday, 17 November 2014, 6:41 > Subject: Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Apache Johnzon 0.2-incubating release > > Hi, > >> That's not how it works at all. Please review [1]. > > Looks correct to me as there is already 3 +1 incubator PCM binding votes. > What > would you expect in this situation? > > Thanks, > > Justin > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
