A little bit formality but the idea is that the IPMC that voted in the dev@ list act in the capacity of PPMCs.
Sending formal request to general@ list to make sure other IPMCs could add additional pair of eyes to review the releases: "... then the Podling SHALL send a summary of that vote to the Incubator'sgeneral list and formally request the Incubator PMC approve such a release. Three +1 Incubator PMC votes are required ..." [1] The IPMCs in the dev@ list should recast its +1 vote in the general list to be accounted for. - Henry [1]: http://incubator.apache.org/incubation/Incubation_Policy.html#Releases On Sun, Nov 16, 2014 at 9:41 PM, Justin Mclean <jus...@classsoftware.com> wrote: > Hi, > >> That's not how it works at all. Please review [1]. > > Looks correct to me as there is already 3 +1 incubator PCM binding votes. > What would you expect in this situation? > > Thanks, > Justin > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
