The README is formatted for GitHub - will update that shortly. The tarball contents being weird I think is due to me having built the tar on OS X - I'll build the next one on a Linux box to be safe. I'll try to get the files missing headers today as well.
A. On Sat, Aug 20, 2011 at 4:28 AM, sebb <seb...@gmail.com> wrote: > Just noticed that the README.md file contains the following: > > You can get in touch with us on the [user > list](https://groups.google.com/a/cloudera.org/group/bigtop-user/topics) > or [developer list]( > https://groups.google.com/a/cloudera.org/group/bigtop-dev/topics). > > This also needs to be fixed before release. > > Why is this not a .txt file? > > On 20 August 2011 03:08, sebb <seb...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On 19 August 2011 23:14, Andrew Bayer <andrew.ba...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Ack, I screwed up and overwrote RC0 with RC1. In any case, please find > RC1 > >> at > http://people.apache.org/~abayer/bigtop-0.1.0-incubating-candidate-1/. > > > > NOTICE looks good, and I can see DISCLAIMER. > > Archive still contains .gitignore files, which should be excluded. > > > >> Website should update shortly. > > > > No sign yet. > > > >> A. > >> > >> On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 3:00 PM, Andrew Bayer <andrew.ba...@gmail.com > >wrote: > >> > >>> Oh, and I'm reformatting NOTICE now as well. The .gitignore files - > I'll > >>> open a bug to remove the top-level one from the tarball, but the ones > that > >>> show up deeper are expected by the build process. > >>> > >>> A. > >>> > >>> > >>> On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 2:58 PM, Andrew Bayer <andrew.ba...@gmail.com > >wrote: > >>> > >>>> Which source files are missing the headers? I know there are some > files > >>>> without headers, but the ones I know of are that way because they're > >>>> expected to be in certain formats, they don't allow comments, etc - > these > >>>> should only be Debian/RPM packaging files, unless I'm missing > something. > >>>> > >>>> As to the package contents - as far as I can tell, everything is under > >>>> bigtop-0.1.0-incubating. The contents there are the same as in SVN, > same > >>>> layout as in SVN, etc. The content under test is not yet being > built/used, > >>>> and may well be reorganized later, but it's all there. If there are > any > >>>> inconsistencies with what's in SVN, let me know and I'll check it out. > >>>> > >>>> Adding DISCLAIMER now. > >>>> > >>>> A. > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 2:48 PM, sebb <seb...@gmail.com> wrote: > >>>> > >>>>> On 19 August 2011 19:25, Andrew Bayer <andrew.ba...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >>>>> > This is the first incubator release for Apache Bigtop, version > >>>>> > 0.1.0-incubating. > >>>>> > > >>>>> > It fixes the following issues: > >>>>> > > >>>>> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?version=12317549&styleName=Html&projectId=12311420 > >>>>> > > >>>>> > *** Please download, test, and vote by Wednesday, August 24 (3 > working > >>>>> days > >>>>> > from now) > >>>>> > > >>>>> > Note that we are voting on the source (tag). > >>>>> > > >>>>> > Source tarball, checksums, signature: > >>>>> > > http://people.apache.org/~abayer/bigtop-0.1.0-incubating-candidate-0/ > >>>>> > >>>>> A lot of source files don't have any license headers. > >>>>> There's no DISCLAIMER in the archive; needs also to be added to SVN > >>>>> alongside NOTICE and LICENSE. > >>>>> > >>>>> The DISCLAIMER text must also be prominently displayed on the bigtop > >>>>> website. > >>>>> > >>>>> IMO these must be fixed before a release. > >>>>> > >>>>> The NOTICE file has a slightly different layout from normal (not a > >>>>> blocker). > >>>>> It would look better if the paragraph were wrapped after "developed > >>>>> at" - as is normally done - because the URL would then not be left > >>>>> dangling. > >>>>> > >>>>> I would not expect the .gitignore files to be included in the source > >>>>> release. > >>>>> > >>>>> There seems to be a problem with the packaging of the archive - I > >>>>> would expect all files to be under the top-level directory > >>>>> bigtop-0.1.0-incubating, but there are also parallel directories > >>>>> package, sqoop, smokes etc. This makes it very difficult to check > the > >>>>> archive against the source archive. > >>>>> > >>>>> Again, I think this needs to be fixed before release. > >>>>> > >>>>> > The tag to be voted on: > >>>>> > > >>>>> > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/bigtop/tags/release-0.1.0-incubating > >>>>> > >>>>> > Bigtop's KEYS file, containing the PGP keys used to sign the > release: > >>>>> > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/bigtop/dist/KEYS > >>>>> > >>>>> sig is OK > >>>>> > >>>>> > Note that the Incubator PMC needs to vote on the release after a > >>>>> successful > >>>>> > PPMC vote before any release can be made official. > >>>>> > > >>>>> > Thanks! > >>>>> > > >>>>> > A. > >>>>> > > >>>>> > >>>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- > >>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > >>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>> > >>> > >> > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > >
