Oh, and I'm reformatting NOTICE now as well. The .gitignore files - I'll open a bug to remove the top-level one from the tarball, but the ones that show up deeper are expected by the build process.
A. On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 2:58 PM, Andrew Bayer <andrew.ba...@gmail.com>wrote: > Which source files are missing the headers? I know there are some files > without headers, but the ones I know of are that way because they're > expected to be in certain formats, they don't allow comments, etc - these > should only be Debian/RPM packaging files, unless I'm missing something. > > As to the package contents - as far as I can tell, everything is under > bigtop-0.1.0-incubating. The contents there are the same as in SVN, same > layout as in SVN, etc. The content under test is not yet being built/used, > and may well be reorganized later, but it's all there. If there are any > inconsistencies with what's in SVN, let me know and I'll check it out. > > Adding DISCLAIMER now. > > A. > > > On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 2:48 PM, sebb <seb...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> On 19 August 2011 19:25, Andrew Bayer <andrew.ba...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > This is the first incubator release for Apache Bigtop, version >> > 0.1.0-incubating. >> > >> > It fixes the following issues: >> > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?version=12317549&styleName=Html&projectId=12311420 >> > >> > *** Please download, test, and vote by Wednesday, August 24 (3 working >> days >> > from now) >> > >> > Note that we are voting on the source (tag). >> > >> > Source tarball, checksums, signature: >> > http://people.apache.org/~abayer/bigtop-0.1.0-incubating-candidate-0/ >> >> A lot of source files don't have any license headers. >> There's no DISCLAIMER in the archive; needs also to be added to SVN >> alongside NOTICE and LICENSE. >> >> The DISCLAIMER text must also be prominently displayed on the bigtop >> website. >> >> IMO these must be fixed before a release. >> >> The NOTICE file has a slightly different layout from normal (not a >> blocker). >> It would look better if the paragraph were wrapped after "developed >> at" - as is normally done - because the URL would then not be left >> dangling. >> >> I would not expect the .gitignore files to be included in the source >> release. >> >> There seems to be a problem with the packaging of the archive - I >> would expect all files to be under the top-level directory >> bigtop-0.1.0-incubating, but there are also parallel directories >> package, sqoop, smokes etc. This makes it very difficult to check the >> archive against the source archive. >> >> Again, I think this needs to be fixed before release. >> >> > The tag to be voted on: >> > >> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/bigtop/tags/release-0.1.0-incubating >> >> > Bigtop's KEYS file, containing the PGP keys used to sign the release: >> > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/bigtop/dist/KEYS >> >> sig is OK >> >> > Note that the Incubator PMC needs to vote on the release after a >> successful >> > PPMC vote before any release can be made official. >> > >> > Thanks! >> > >> > A. >> > >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org >> >> >
