This thread has got rather long and complicated. May I suggest creating a new thread (i.e. not a reply) with just the details required for the new vote?
Change the subject to include RC2 please. Thanks! On 22 August 2011 16:26, Andrew Bayer <andrew.ba...@gmail.com> wrote: > Whoops. Sorry about that. New tag created - > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/bigtop/tags/release-0.1.0-incubating-RC2 > > A. > > On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 5:37 AM, sebb <seb...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Tags are supposed to be immutable. >> >> For example, add an -RCn suffix which is removed (SVN copy or rename) >> when the vote succeeds. >> >> Failing that, please quote the revision number of the tag. >> >> Otherwise it's not possible to determine what was actually voted on. >> >> [BTW, the new tar file format reads OK in Winzip and Ant.] >> >> On 22 August 2011 01:56, Andrew Bayer <andrew.ba...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > Tag replaced. >> > >> > A. >> > >> > On Sun, Aug 21, 2011 at 5:26 PM, sebb <seb...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > >> >> On 22 August 2011 00:49, Andrew Bayer <andrew.ba...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> > New candidate up at >> >> > http://people.apache.org/~abayer/bigtop-0.1.0-incubating-candidate-2/ >> . >> >> The >> >> > only files RAT still sees missing license headers are Debian packaging >> >> files >> >> > that are just lists of files, and test data files. README.md has been >> >> > replaced with README. The gitignore files are, at least for now, >> excluded >> >> > from the tarball. The webpage has been updated. The tarball has been >> >> built >> >> > with GNU tar, rather than BSD tar. >> >> > >> >> > Let me know if there are any more issues. Thanks! >> >> >> >> Can't find an SVN tag for the source. >> >> >> >> > A. >> >> > >> >> > On Sun, Aug 21, 2011 at 11:45 AM, Andrew Bayer < >> andrew.ba...@gmail.com >> >> >wrote: >> >> > >> >> >> The README is formatted for GitHub - will update that shortly. The >> >> tarball >> >> >> contents being weird I think is due to me having built the tar on OS >> X - >> >> >> I'll build the next one on a Linux box to be safe. I'll try to get >> the >> >> files >> >> >> missing headers today as well. >> >> >> >> >> >> A. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> On Sat, Aug 20, 2011 at 4:28 AM, sebb <seb...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >>> Just noticed that the README.md file contains the following: >> >> >>> >> >> >>> You can get in touch with us on the [user >> >> >>> list]( >> >> https://groups.google.com/a/cloudera.org/group/bigtop-user/topics) >> >> >>> or [developer list]( >> >> >>> https://groups.google.com/a/cloudera.org/group/bigtop-dev/topics). >> >> >>> >> >> >>> This also needs to be fixed before release. >> >> >>> >> >> >>> Why is this not a .txt file? >> >> >>> >> >> >>> On 20 August 2011 03:08, sebb <seb...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> >>> > On 19 August 2011 23:14, Andrew Bayer <andrew.ba...@gmail.com> >> >> wrote: >> >> >>> >> Ack, I screwed up and overwrote RC0 with RC1. In any case, please >> >> find >> >> >>> RC1 >> >> >>> >> at >> >> >>> >> http://people.apache.org/~abayer/bigtop-0.1.0-incubating-candidate-1/. >> >> >>> > >> >> >>> > NOTICE looks good, and I can see DISCLAIMER. >> >> >>> > Archive still contains .gitignore files, which should be excluded. >> >> >>> > >> >> >>> >> Website should update shortly. >> >> >>> > >> >> >>> > No sign yet. >> >> >>> > >> >> >>> >> A. >> >> >>> >> >> >> >>> >> On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 3:00 PM, Andrew Bayer < >> >> andrew.ba...@gmail.com >> >> >>> >wrote: >> >> >>> >> >> >> >>> >>> Oh, and I'm reformatting NOTICE now as well. The .gitignore >> files - >> >> >>> I'll >> >> >>> >>> open a bug to remove the top-level one from the tarball, but the >> >> ones >> >> >>> that >> >> >>> >>> show up deeper are expected by the build process. >> >> >>> >>> >> >> >>> >>> A. >> >> >>> >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >> >>> >>> On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 2:58 PM, Andrew Bayer < >> >> andrew.ba...@gmail.com >> >> >>> >wrote: >> >> >>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>> Which source files are missing the headers? I know there are >> some >> >> >>> files >> >> >>> >>>> without headers, but the ones I know of are that way because >> >> they're >> >> >>> >>>> expected to be in certain formats, they don't allow comments, >> etc >> >> - >> >> >>> these >> >> >>> >>>> should only be Debian/RPM packaging files, unless I'm missing >> >> >>> something. >> >> >>> >>>> >> >> >>> >>>> As to the package contents - as far as I can tell, everything >> is >> >> >>> under >> >> >>> >>>> bigtop-0.1.0-incubating. The contents there are the same as in >> >> SVN, >> >> >>> same >> >> >>> >>>> layout as in SVN, etc. The content under test is not yet being >> >> >>> built/used, >> >> >>> >>>> and may well be reorganized later, but it's all there. If there >> >> are >> >> >>> any >> >> >>> >>>> inconsistencies with what's in SVN, let me know and I'll check >> it >> >> >>> out. >> >> >>> >>>> >> >> >>> >>>> Adding DISCLAIMER now. >> >> >>> >>>> >> >> >>> >>>> A. >> >> >>> >>>> >> >> >>> >>>> >> >> >>> >>>> On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 2:48 PM, sebb <seb...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >> >>> >>>> >> >> >>> >>>>> On 19 August 2011 19:25, Andrew Bayer <andrew.ba...@gmail.com >> > >> >> >>> wrote: >> >> >>> >>>>> > This is the first incubator release for Apache Bigtop, >> version >> >> >>> >>>>> > 0.1.0-incubating. >> >> >>> >>>>> > >> >> >>> >>>>> > It fixes the following issues: >> >> >>> >>>>> > >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?version=12317549&styleName=Html&projectId=12311420 >> >> >>> >>>>> > >> >> >>> >>>>> > *** Please download, test, and vote by Wednesday, August 24 >> (3 >> >> >>> working >> >> >>> >>>>> days >> >> >>> >>>>> > from now) >> >> >>> >>>>> > >> >> >>> >>>>> > Note that we are voting on the source (tag). >> >> >>> >>>>> > >> >> >>> >>>>> > Source tarball, checksums, signature: >> >> >>> >>>>> > >> >> >>> >> http://people.apache.org/~abayer/bigtop-0.1.0-incubating-candidate-0/ >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> >>> >>>>> A lot of source files don't have any license headers. >> >> >>> >>>>> There's no DISCLAIMER in the archive; needs also to be added >> to >> >> SVN >> >> >>> >>>>> alongside NOTICE and LICENSE. >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> >>> >>>>> The DISCLAIMER text must also be prominently displayed on the >> >> bigtop >> >> >>> >>>>> website. >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> >>> >>>>> IMO these must be fixed before a release. >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> >>> >>>>> The NOTICE file has a slightly different layout from normal >> (not >> >> a >> >> >>> >>>>> blocker). >> >> >>> >>>>> It would look better if the paragraph were wrapped after >> >> "developed >> >> >>> >>>>> at" - as is normally done - because the URL would then not be >> >> left >> >> >>> >>>>> dangling. >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> >>> >>>>> I would not expect the .gitignore files to be included in the >> >> source >> >> >>> >>>>> release. >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> >>> >>>>> There seems to be a problem with the packaging of the archive >> - I >> >> >>> >>>>> would expect all files to be under the top-level directory >> >> >>> >>>>> bigtop-0.1.0-incubating, but there are also parallel >> directories >> >> >>> >>>>> package, sqoop, smokes etc. This makes it very difficult to >> >> check >> >> >>> the >> >> >>> >>>>> archive against the source archive. >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> >>> >>>>> Again, I think this needs to be fixed before release. >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> >>> >>>>> > The tag to be voted on: >> >> >>> >>>>> > >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/bigtop/tags/release-0.1.0-incubating >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> >>> >>>>> > Bigtop's KEYS file, containing the PGP keys used to sign the >> >> >>> release: >> >> >>> >>>>> > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/bigtop/dist/KEYS >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> >>> >>>>> sig is OK >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> >>> >>>>> > Note that the Incubator PMC needs to vote on the release >> after >> >> a >> >> >>> >>>>> successful >> >> >>> >>>>> > PPMC vote before any release can be made official. >> >> >>> >>>>> > >> >> >>> >>>>> > Thanks! >> >> >>> >>>>> > >> >> >>> >>>>> > A. >> >> >>> >>>>> > >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> >>> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >> >>> >>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: >> general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org >> >> >>> >>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: >> >> general-h...@incubator.apache.org >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> >>> >>>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >>> > >> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >> >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org >> >> >>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org >> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> > >> > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
