On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 12:04 PM, Andrew Bayer <andrew.ba...@gmail.com> wrote: > fwiw, in this case, we weren't releasing via Maven, so there wasn't a > technical reason to reuse the tag. > > And yeah, sorry, this is my first ever ASF release, and our mentors > suggested we try releasing in order to find out what needed to be fixed for > the release. =)
Ah, just what you were hoping for, contradictory direction. Sorry, we're really good at that here at the incubator. > > A. > > On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 8:56 AM, Benson Margulies > <bimargul...@gmail.com>wrote: > >> On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 11:26 AM, Andrew Bayer <andrew.ba...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> > Whoops. Sorry about that. New tag created - >> > >> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/bigtop/tags/release-0.1.0-incubating-RC2 >> > >> > A. >> > >> > On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 5:37 AM, sebb <seb...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > >> >> Tags are supposed to be immutable. >> >> Two points here. >> >> 1) It's a bad idea to do serious QA only as part of a release vote. It >> leads to a lot of noise and duplicated effort. Some of what led to a >> respin here could have been tested for before starting a vote. >> >> 2) Sebb, I'm sorry to point out that labels are frequently mutated as >> part of the release process in various TLP's of which am a part. The >> typical procedure is: >> >> 1) Try very hard to sort out any possible problems. >> 2) Run maven-release-plugin. This creates a tag named after the >> proposed release (e.g. cxf-2.4). >> 3) Start vote. >> 3) If awful turns up, delete tag, goto 1. >> >> The problem is that maven metadata captures the actual svn path, so if >> you try to take the '-rcn and rename' you end up with poms with the >> wrong svn tags in them. So we're all stuck with not-quite-immutable >> tags. >> >> >> >> >> For example, add an -RCn suffix which is removed (SVN copy or rename) >> >> when the vote succeeds. >> >> >> >> Failing that, please quote the revision number of the tag. >> >> >> >> Otherwise it's not possible to determine what was actually voted on. >> >> >> >> [BTW, the new tar file format reads OK in Winzip and Ant.] >> >> >> >> On 22 August 2011 01:56, Andrew Bayer <andrew.ba...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> > Tag replaced. >> >> > >> >> > A. >> >> > >> >> > On Sun, Aug 21, 2011 at 5:26 PM, sebb <seb...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> > >> >> >> On 22 August 2011 00:49, Andrew Bayer <andrew.ba...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >> >> > New candidate up at >> >> >> > >> http://people.apache.org/~abayer/bigtop-0.1.0-incubating-candidate-2/ >> >> . >> >> >> The >> >> >> > only files RAT still sees missing license headers are Debian >> packaging >> >> >> files >> >> >> > that are just lists of files, and test data files. README.md has >> been >> >> >> > replaced with README. The gitignore files are, at least for now, >> >> excluded >> >> >> > from the tarball. The webpage has been updated. The tarball has >> been >> >> >> built >> >> >> > with GNU tar, rather than BSD tar. >> >> >> > >> >> >> > Let me know if there are any more issues. Thanks! >> >> >> >> >> >> Can't find an SVN tag for the source. >> >> >> >> >> >> > A. >> >> >> > >> >> >> > On Sun, Aug 21, 2011 at 11:45 AM, Andrew Bayer < >> >> andrew.ba...@gmail.com >> >> >> >wrote: >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> The README is formatted for GitHub - will update that shortly. The >> >> >> tarball >> >> >> >> contents being weird I think is due to me having built the tar on >> OS >> >> X - >> >> >> >> I'll build the next one on a Linux box to be safe. I'll try to get >> >> the >> >> >> files >> >> >> >> missing headers today as well. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> A. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> On Sat, Aug 20, 2011 at 4:28 AM, sebb <seb...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>> Just noticed that the README.md file contains the following: >> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >>> You can get in touch with us on the [user >> >> >> >>> list]( >> >> >> https://groups.google.com/a/cloudera.org/group/bigtop-user/topics) >> >> >> >>> or [developer list]( >> >> >> >>> https://groups.google.com/a/cloudera.org/group/bigtop-dev/topics >> ). >> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >>> This also needs to be fixed before release. >> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >>> Why is this not a .txt file? >> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >>> On 20 August 2011 03:08, sebb <seb...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> >> >>> > On 19 August 2011 23:14, Andrew Bayer <andrew.ba...@gmail.com> >> >> >> wrote: >> >> >> >>> >> Ack, I screwed up and overwrote RC0 with RC1. In any case, >> please >> >> >> find >> >> >> >>> RC1 >> >> >> >>> >> at >> >> >> >>> >> >> http://people.apache.org/~abayer/bigtop-0.1.0-incubating-candidate-1/. >> >> >> >>> > >> >> >> >>> > NOTICE looks good, and I can see DISCLAIMER. >> >> >> >>> > Archive still contains .gitignore files, which should be >> excluded. >> >> >> >>> > >> >> >> >>> >> Website should update shortly. >> >> >> >>> > >> >> >> >>> > No sign yet. >> >> >> >>> > >> >> >> >>> >> A. >> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>> >> On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 3:00 PM, Andrew Bayer < >> >> >> andrew.ba...@gmail.com >> >> >> >>> >wrote: >> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>> >>> Oh, and I'm reformatting NOTICE now as well. The .gitignore >> >> files - >> >> >> >>> I'll >> >> >> >>> >>> open a bug to remove the top-level one from the tarball, but >> the >> >> >> ones >> >> >> >>> that >> >> >> >>> >>> show up deeper are expected by the build process. >> >> >> >>> >>> >> >> >> >>> >>> A. >> >> >> >>> >>> >> >> >> >>> >>> >> >> >> >>> >>> On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 2:58 PM, Andrew Bayer < >> >> >> andrew.ba...@gmail.com >> >> >> >>> >wrote: >> >> >> >>> >>> >> >> >> >>> >>>> Which source files are missing the headers? I know there are >> >> some >> >> >> >>> files >> >> >> >>> >>>> without headers, but the ones I know of are that way because >> >> >> they're >> >> >> >>> >>>> expected to be in certain formats, they don't allow >> comments, >> >> etc >> >> >> - >> >> >> >>> these >> >> >> >>> >>>> should only be Debian/RPM packaging files, unless I'm >> missing >> >> >> >>> something. >> >> >> >>> >>>> >> >> >> >>> >>>> As to the package contents - as far as I can tell, >> everything >> >> is >> >> >> >>> under >> >> >> >>> >>>> bigtop-0.1.0-incubating. The contents there are the same as >> in >> >> >> SVN, >> >> >> >>> same >> >> >> >>> >>>> layout as in SVN, etc. The content under test is not yet >> being >> >> >> >>> built/used, >> >> >> >>> >>>> and may well be reorganized later, but it's all there. If >> there >> >> >> are >> >> >> >>> any >> >> >> >>> >>>> inconsistencies with what's in SVN, let me know and I'll >> check >> >> it >> >> >> >>> out. >> >> >> >>> >>>> >> >> >> >>> >>>> Adding DISCLAIMER now. >> >> >> >>> >>>> >> >> >> >>> >>>> A. >> >> >> >>> >>>> >> >> >> >>> >>>> >> >> >> >>> >>>> On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 2:48 PM, sebb <seb...@gmail.com> >> >> wrote: >> >> >> >>> >>>> >> >> >> >>> >>>>> On 19 August 2011 19:25, Andrew Bayer < >> andrew.ba...@gmail.com >> >> > >> >> >> >>> wrote: >> >> >> >>> >>>>> > This is the first incubator release for Apache Bigtop, >> >> version >> >> >> >>> >>>>> > 0.1.0-incubating. >> >> >> >>> >>>>> > >> >> >> >>> >>>>> > It fixes the following issues: >> >> >> >>> >>>>> > >> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?version=12317549&styleName=Html&projectId=12311420 >> >> >> >>> >>>>> > >> >> >> >>> >>>>> > *** Please download, test, and vote by Wednesday, August >> 24 >> >> (3 >> >> >> >>> working >> >> >> >>> >>>>> days >> >> >> >>> >>>>> > from now) >> >> >> >>> >>>>> > >> >> >> >>> >>>>> > Note that we are voting on the source (tag). >> >> >> >>> >>>>> > >> >> >> >>> >>>>> > Source tarball, checksums, signature: >> >> >> >>> >>>>> > >> >> >> >>> >> >> http://people.apache.org/~abayer/bigtop-0.1.0-incubating-candidate-0/ >> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> >> >>> >>>>> A lot of source files don't have any license headers. >> >> >> >>> >>>>> There's no DISCLAIMER in the archive; needs also to be >> added >> >> to >> >> >> SVN >> >> >> >>> >>>>> alongside NOTICE and LICENSE. >> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> >> >>> >>>>> The DISCLAIMER text must also be prominently displayed on >> the >> >> >> bigtop >> >> >> >>> >>>>> website. >> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> >> >>> >>>>> IMO these must be fixed before a release. >> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> >> >>> >>>>> The NOTICE file has a slightly different layout from normal >> >> (not >> >> >> a >> >> >> >>> >>>>> blocker). >> >> >> >>> >>>>> It would look better if the paragraph were wrapped after >> >> >> "developed >> >> >> >>> >>>>> at" - as is normally done - because the URL would then not >> be >> >> >> left >> >> >> >>> >>>>> dangling. >> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> >> >>> >>>>> I would not expect the .gitignore files to be included in >> the >> >> >> source >> >> >> >>> >>>>> release. >> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> >> >>> >>>>> There seems to be a problem with the packaging of the >> archive >> >> - I >> >> >> >>> >>>>> would expect all files to be under the top-level directory >> >> >> >>> >>>>> bigtop-0.1.0-incubating, but there are also parallel >> >> directories >> >> >> >>> >>>>> package, sqoop, smokes etc. This makes it very difficult >> to >> >> >> check >> >> >> >>> the >> >> >> >>> >>>>> archive against the source archive. >> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> >> >>> >>>>> Again, I think this needs to be fixed before release. >> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> >> >>> >>>>> > The tag to be voted on: >> >> >> >>> >>>>> > >> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/bigtop/tags/release-0.1.0-incubating >> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> >> >>> >>>>> > Bigtop's KEYS file, containing the PGP keys used to sign >> the >> >> >> >>> release: >> >> >> >>> >>>>> > >> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/bigtop/dist/KEYS >> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> >> >>> >>>>> sig is OK >> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> >> >>> >>>>> > Note that the Incubator PMC needs to vote on the release >> >> after >> >> >> a >> >> >> >>> >>>>> successful >> >> >> >>> >>>>> > PPMC vote before any release can be made official. >> >> >> >>> >>>>> > >> >> >> >>> >>>>> > Thanks! >> >> >> >>> >>>>> > >> >> >> >>> >>>>> > A. >> >> >> >>> >>>>> > >> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> >> >>> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >> >> >>> >>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: >> >> general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org >> >> >> >>> >>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: >> >> >> general-h...@incubator.apache.org >> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> >> >>> >>>> >> >> >> >>> >>> >> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>> > >> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >>> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >> >> >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org >> >> >> >>> For additional commands, e-mail: >> general-h...@incubator.apache.org >> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> > >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org >> >> > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
