On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 12:45 PM, Joe Schaefer <joe_schae...@yahoo.com> wrote: > The first idea should be fairly straightforward: that for > the projects I participate in (so far thrift and sis), that > the IPMC delegates to the PPMC the decision-making process > for voting in new committers: basically rolling back the clock > to May 1, 2007 on guides/ppmc.html. > > The second idea is more controversial: to hold IPMC votes to > admit all significant committers to those projects to the IPMC > itself. The purpose of this concept is to allow those who > best know the codebase to provide IPMC oversight over it, > especially as it pertains to releases.
Just to pile on, as a member of the SIS podling, I'm +1 to both of these ideas. Greg --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
