Joe,
Can they not +1 it either? :) seriously, it would be a bit hard to track 2
levels of ipmc members
-- dims
On 08/11/2010 07:24 PM, Joe Schaefer wrote:
----- Original Message ----
From: Davanum Srinivas<dava...@gmail.com>
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Sent: Wed, August 11, 2010 6:28:17 PM
Subject: Re: an experiment
Ant,
My personal opinion (and i am hoping!) was that such individuals
from ppmc's who end up in ipmc would help build bridges
between podlings and will help get lessons learned (when any ppmc
has issues/problems/roadblocks) back to their ppmc.
This is one area where i've seen people struggle, folks from
different projects learning the same lessons the hard way.
Good point.
I am not too worried about "binding" vote one podling ppmc
member have over another podling's release. the "binding" is
for me a legal thing (as in we need 3 binding ipmc votes for a release).
I think ant is more concerned about graduation votes. We
could simply write a new rule that podling committers on
the IPMC brought in through my initiative MUST ABSTAIN from
graduation votes. I don't think the board would be the
least bit upset if we did that.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
