On 12/21/05, James Strachan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 20 Dec 2005, at 19:33, Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
> I wondered why this was mandatory; the purpose of the Java package > name scheme is purely to avoid clashes; provided the .org domain name > is owned (& we'd be happy to donate to Apache) I don't see why we > need to force a major package name change on our users. If it is > mandatory then hey we'll comply I'm just questioning who made this > decision and why? Managing additional domains is most possibly a burden for infra. Jochen -- Often it does seem a pity that Noah and his party did not miss the boat. (Mark Twain) --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
