On 21 Dec 2005, at 11:22, Jochen Wiedmann wrote:
On 12/21/05, James Strachan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 20 Dec 2005, at 19:33, Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
I wondered why this was mandatory; the purpose of the Java package
name scheme is purely to avoid clashes; provided the .org domain name
is owned (& we'd be happy to donate to Apache) I don't see why we
need to force a major package name change on our users. If it is
mandatory then hey we'll comply I'm just questioning who made this
decision and why?
Managing additional domains is most possibly a burden for infra.
They don't have to manage them at all - its nothing to do with
infrastructure, purely to do with Java class names and a mechanism to
avoid clashes.
James
-------
http://radio.weblogs.com/0112098/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
