> http://archives.seul.org/geda/user/Jan-2009/msg00056.html > May be some pages in that example have similarity to > your screen shot example?
Yes, very similar. > its not difficult to have the gnet-xxx.scm to flatten > it for flat-netlist. IMHO the ability to expand those lists into individual connections should be done globally for all netlisters, though, not something that a netlister "could do for itself". A consistent view of what the schematic *means* is important. > If I understand it correctly, you would like to see > the top portion of your screen shot's symbol, but > have them netlisted as if its the bottom? Yes. > If thats the case, it should not be difficult. But if you want both > to be shown on schematics and netlist only the bottom, I have to > think about it. The user should be *able* to use either, but obviously, one chip with both sets of pins would be a mistake. I just did it that way because it was easier for me to "whip it together" for the photo. _______________________________________________ geda-dev mailing list [email protected] http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-dev
