On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 01:42:55PM +0200, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 03:39:58PM +0400, Maksim Kuznetsov wrote:
> > 2013/4/29 Jakub Jelinek <[email protected]>:
> > > Also, why are you handling just %{ and %}, and
> > > not also %| ? I mean, if you want to print say {|} into assembly for both
> > > dialects, don't you need:
> > > asm ("{dialect1%{%|%}|%{%|%}dialect2}");
> > > or similar? If you use just | instead of %|, it would be handled as
> > > separator of the dialects.
> >
> > Sure. %| was removed due to concerns over some target architectures
> > already use it, but now %| is under ASSEMBLER_DIALECT and doesn't seem
> > to affect them.
> >
> > ChangeLog:
> >
> > 2013-04-29 Maxim Kuznetsov <[email protected]>
> > * final.c (do_assembler_dialects): Don't handle curly braces and
> > vertical bar escaped by % as dialect delimiters.
> > (output_asm_insn): Print curly braces and vertical bar if escaped
> > by % and ASSEMBLER_DIALECT defined.
> > * doc/tm.texi (ASSEMBLER_DIALECT): Document new standard escapes.
> >
> > testsuite/ChangeLog:
> >
> > 2013-04-29 Maxim Kuznetsov <[email protected]>
> >
> > * gcc.target/i386/asm-dialect-2.c: New testcase.
>
> Ok, thanks.
I've noticed this hasn't been applied yet; if you don't have SVN access, you
need to mention it explicitly, or is there other reason why it hasn't been
committed?
Jakub
