Yep, sure. I missed that (*p != NULL) check. Thanks, Michael
On 29 March 2013 05:15, Segher Boessenkool <seg...@kernel.crashing.org> wrote: >> I'd suggest rewriting this expression in some easier way: >> p += (*p == '%' && *(p + 1)) ? 2 : 1; >> >> I'd prefer >> if (*p == '%') >> p++; >> p++; > > > That's not the same thing though. Maksim's code is correct, > although it could certainly be written more clearly. > > Maybe something like > > > if (*p == '%') > p++; > if (*p) > p++; > > > Segher > -- --- Best regards, Michael V. Zolotukhin, Software Engineer Intel Corporation.
