Re: [PATCH 2/2] jit: use FINAL and OVERRIDE throughout

[David Malcolm]

On Fri, 2016-05-06 at 12:40 -0400, David Malcolm wrote:
> Mark most virtual functions in gcc/jit as being FINAL OVERRIDE.
> gcc::jit::recording::lvalue::access_as_rvalue is the sole OVERRIDE
> that isn't a FINAL.
> 
> Successfully bootstrapped&regrtested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu.
> 
> I can self-approve this, but as asked in patch 1,
> does "final" imply "override"?  Is "final override" a tautology?

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/29412412/does-final-imply-override s
ays that "final override" is *not* tautologous.

I've committed this jit patch to trunk as r236223.

Dave