On 05/06/2016 07:33 PM, Trevor Saunders wrote: > On Fri, May 06, 2016 at 07:10:33PM +0100, Pedro Alves wrote:
>> I like your names without the GCC_ prefix better though, >> for the same reason of standardizing binutils-gdb + gcc >> on the same symbols. > > I agree, though I'm not really sure when gdb / binutils stuff will > support building as C++11. gdb already builds as a C++ compiler by default today, and will switch to C++-only right after the next release (couple months), the latest. Thanks, Pedro Alves
