On 05/06/2016 06:56 PM, Pedro Alves wrote:
> If building gcc as a C++11 program is supported, then it
> won't be possible to use these names as symbols for
> anything else anyway?
Just found out the above is not true. Apparently I've
been stuck in C++98 for too long... Sorry about the noise.
I was going to suggest to put this in include/ansidecl.h,
so that all C++ libraries / programs in binutils-gdb use the same
thing, instead of each reinventing the wheel, and I found
there's already something there:
/* This is used to mark a class or virtual function as final. */
#if __cplusplus >= 201103L
#define GCC_FINAL final
#elif GCC_VERSION >= 4007
#define GCC_FINAL __final
#else
#define GCC_FINAL
#endif
From:
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-08/msg00455.html
Apparently the patch that actually uses that was reverted,
as I can't find any use.
I like your names without the GCC_ prefix better though,
for the same reason of standardizing binutils-gdb + gcc
on the same symbols.
--
Thanks,
Pedro Alves
